Expertise
- Litigation solicitor
- Dispute Resolution
- Lawyer
- Legal Advice
- Shareholder Disputes
- Commercial contracts
- Director Disputes
- Law advice
- Enforcement action
- Debt Recovery
- negligence
- Breach of Contract
- Fraud
- Injunctions
- ADR
- 3HR Corporate Solicitors
Summary
Adam is a hardworking and tenacious commercial litigator who has significant experience dealing with high value and complex multi-jurisdictional litigation. Adam is Head of the Litigation/ Dispute Resolution department at 3HR Corporate Solicitors, who are ranked in the Legal 500 as a leading firm. Adam specialises in the following areas:- Chancery Litigation Civil Fraud Actions- Investment fraud and other types of fraud Injunctions- Worldwide and domestic freezing injunctions, proprietary injunctions, Interlocutory prohibitory and mandatory injunctions and committal proceedings Contractual Disputes and Misrepresentation claims Shareholder Disputes/ Unfair Prejudice Petitions and Partnership Disputes Insolvency- Bankruptcy Petitions and winding up petitions Property Disputes (domestic and international) Debt Recovery- asset tracing Enforcement Action- foreign judgments, charging orders, Orders for sale Mediation and other Alternative Dispute Resolution Trusts and Rights in Property Claims Professional Negligence Disputes Landlord & Tenant Disputes- repossession Disrepair Claims Building Disputes Adam has worked on a number of reported cases, including:- Kotecha v Kotecha [2018] EWHC 247 (Ch) – A Partnership dispute including the dissolution of the Partnership and third party claims to Partnership assets. Baljit Singh Bhandal v Kieran Wallace & Eamonn Richardson (Joint Special Liquidators of Irish Bank Resolution Corporation Limited) [2017] WL 02774035 – An application to set aside a statutory demand based on the mutuality between costs owed to liquidators, upon which the demand was based, and the counterclaim which was a judgment against the company in respect of which the liquidators were appointed. Otuo v Brierley [2014] EWCA Civ 1804 – Successfully opposing the Claimant’s application for permission to appeal